Fix OUSD from the Inside

12 min read

There was a time earlier in my life where I often found myself in the role of mindless antagonist against the powers that be, as I believed there was no reason to deal reasonably with an unreasonable system. When institutions put into place to protect the interests of our people are used to legitimize behavior that only benefits a few people, how can anything actually be changed by working within those institutions? I feel very strongly that this is the case right now across a large swath of the American government, and you probably do too.

But can we say the same about Oakland's institutions, and specifically Oakland Unified School District?

It certainly felt that way to me not too long ago, as I listened to strong, loud, intelligent antagonists call for sweeping changes to the board and district leadership. There were very few, if any, folks actually countering that narrative publicly. And, most importantly, I had no idea how things are actually supposed to work at a large public school district. It was easy to jump in and pile on: "How could we trust any group of people if they let it get this bad?"

Since then, I somehow ended up actually trying to work within the institution instead of against it. It's something lots of other OUSD volunteers and I spend many hours a week doing. The longer we do it, the more we learn about how truly complex OUSD's challenges are, no matter who is working on them. We understand that we are in a perennial crisis, not because of a year or two of mismanagement and bad decisions, but because for decades our best and most powerful people have fought over meager resources instead of collectively figuring out how best to use them.

I've heard from a number of people that this makes me sound like an apologist, as if I am standing naively before some shadowy group of bureaucratic monsters or with an agenda of some sort. Well, I'd like to respectfully ask anyone reading this to consider a possible alternative:

We can fix this thing as partners, from the inside. The only way to make it happen is by availing ourselves of the tools and systems that are already in place.

2026-27 Is a Most Important Year

If you don't know anything about budget cycles, funding formulas, and stuff like that, you're in a pretty crowded club. It's possible I've never encountered a system more arcane than the one used for California's public education funding. And OUSD's funding system has some of that special Oakland sauce that makes it even more, uh, "challenging" to understand.

Without going into the mind-numbing details, I want to point out a few things at a high level that I believe sum up our biggest issues:

  1. Because of many, many factors, OUSD has not had a sound structure to plan for financial sustainability for decades. This is not a recent occurrence.1
  2. The district was able to mask its underlying issues during recent years because of a massive influx of new revenue from temporary pandemic funding.
  3. The pandemic money is now basically gone, and many of the structural issues in the district remain.2
  4. OUSD must rewrite its Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) this year. That plan is supposed to tie vital, measurable goals for students to funding. This only happens every three years.3
  5. For the first time that anyone can remember, we have a board that has complete authority to make difficult decisions for itself, and that has already shown itself capable of working with district leadership to do so.4

In short, the gears are meshing in a very specific way this year. This makes it incredibly important for all our different groups to get on board with solutions… Right at this very moment.

My whole thing (and I've written about it quite a bit) is that we need to carry our solutions as a community beyond politics and the battles between private and public interest. That starts (and ends) with the idea of self-governance. This simply means that beyond just trusting the folks we voted for (or against) to do what is needed to solve our problems, we work with them. We hold them accountable and provide them with our collaborative insight so that they can do their job more effectively.

Want to Help? Start by Joining Your School Site Council This Month

School Site Councils (SSCs) are quite simply the most accessible and impactful entry points into our district's systems of self-governance. I can almost guarantee that your school needs volunteers to serve as voting members. I can also guarantee that engaging will give you new insights about how your school actually funds priorities for students. Read my primer on my school's Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) for an example, and please attend your school's elections (a.k.a. establishment) meeting. They are supposed to happen in September, so ask your principal or staff for the date and time!

An SSC exists at every single OUSD school and its members work directly with the principal, offering oversight on the school's SPSA and spending related to it.5 Joining your SSC gives you an open line to both your school's staff and your community. It also opens a path for you to get involved in self-governance at the district level, something about which I have plenty to say in the next section.

At a recent community meeting I helped to facilitate, an OUSD speech therapist went even further on this. She told us to remind everyone that monthly SSC meetings are not just for voting members, they are open to the public.6 Parents should attend, ask questions, and offer feedback even if they aren't voting. She passionately believes that it is an effective way to get your concerns and opinions in front of those at your school that can most do something about them.

The OUSD Parent and Student Community Needs You

Contrary to the narrative that there are few opportunities to engage directly with our district and board, I am living proof that it's actually pretty easy to get in touch with any of them. When you simply use certain channels that are open to any of us, they usually do a good job of listening.

If you are not only concerned with what's going on at your school, but also about the present and future of the district at large, I would like to invite you to join the OUSD Parent and Student Advisory Committee, or PSAC. I am a lead delegate of this body, and I don't think there is currently a better way for our community to effect actual, positive change in our district than by joining as a delegate or by simply attending our public meetings.

I will be the first to admit that PSAC has a lot on our plate this year. If you join, it will not be immediately easy to process the information that we're getting from district staff and leaders. That said, the greater the number of engaged folks that join, the easier it will be, no matter your particular background or knowledge level. I am absolutely certain that if you are interested in engaging cooperatively with our community and presenting your thoughts respectfully, you will increase our collective impact. We need your voice now more than ever.

PSAC currently has at least two vacancies in every single one of its seven districts except for District 4 (you got it nice, D4!). Because the two current members of District 6 are at the end of their terms, District 6 will have four vacancies. That would mean no representation on PSAC, so let's go D6!

That adds up to 14 vacancies district-wide on PSAC.7 That's 14 delegates to a body that reports directly to the school board and that works closely with district staff and leadership multiple times a month.8 You can honestly make a difference by doing this, and I hope you'll consider it. Reach out to me personally if you have any questions!

Consider it, OUSD families: We have to oversee something like $30 million in reductions this year alone.9 To continue our progress toward sustainability, we will need to both rewrite our LCAP with great care and figure out how to reshape our district over the next couple of years. This must all happen while keeping the best interests of students and families at the center of our efforts. Will we trust those with political interests or administrators from outside Oakland to do that, or will we show up in force as a community?

Start with your School Site Council and follow by attending the meetings of PSAC. I truly hope to see you soon!

Footnotes

  1. Outside reviewers have been saying this for a long time. The 2017-18 Alameda County Civil Grand Jury wrote that "for more than a decade, numerous experts and outside reviewers, including the grand juries in 2013-2014 and 2015-2016, have highlighted the fiscal deficits plaguing OUSD," and that "in fiscal year 2017-2018, like so many previous years, OUSD operated in the red" (2017-18 Final Report, "OUSD: A Broken Culture"; coverage in EdSource, June 2018). In its March 1, 2019 letter to the Legislature under AB 1840, FCMAT quoted the district's own self-assessment: "a lack of sufficient controls in place to manage for long-term balance and sustainability" and "roll-over budgeting" that left OUSD "unable to carefully review the multi-year impact of expenditure decisions." And of course, the 2003 state loan that started receivership was itself a response to a deficit the district couldn't cover (SB 39, 2003). For the longer story, see my history of the political forces shaping OUSD.

  2. Per the California Department of Education's Schedule of ESSER III Allocations (from the ESSER III Funding Results page, updated April 2026), OUSD's final allocation from the third and largest round of federal pandemic relief was $129,898,721, and every dollar of it has been paid out; the balance remaining is zero. That's on top of the earlier ESSER I and II rounds. The CDE's ESSER III FAQ states that the funds were "available for obligation by LEAs through September 30, 2024," with liquidation required within 120 days after that. In other words, the last of the pandemic money left the building during the 2024-25 school year.

  3. California Education Code § 52060(b): a district's LCAP "shall be effective for a period of three years, and shall be updated on or before July 1 of each year." OUSD's current plan covers 2024-25 through 2026-27, so the next three-year plan (2027-30) must be adopted by July 1, 2027, meaning it gets written this school year. See OUSD's LCAP page.

  4. When OUSD took the $100 million state loan in 2003, the State Superintendent of Public Instruction assumed "all of the rights, duties, and powers of the district's governing board." Those powers were reinstated on June 28, 2009, but a state trustee was appointed with "stay and rescind authority over actions by the governing board" (FCMAT, March 1, 2019). That authority was not theoretical: in 2024 the trustee stopped the board from advancing labor negotiations until it made progress on a school consolidation plan (The Oaklandside, January 23, 2025). The district made its final loan payments on June 30, 2025, ending receivership after 22 years (OUSD announcement, April 22, 2025; The Oaklandside, May 13, 2025). The first big test of that unsupervised authority was the December 10, 2025 vote to close a $102.5 million gap through cuts rather than a new loan (The Oaklandside, December 11, 2025); I wrote about that choice in Two Bad Doors.

  5. Any school that runs a categorical program requiring a School Plan for Student Achievement must have a School Site Council (Ed. Code § 65000(b)); in practice, that is every OUSD school. The SSC "develops the content of the SPSA" and must review and update it annually, "including proposed expenditure of funds allocated to the school" (Ed. Code § 64001(g)(1) and (i)). Composition is set by statute too: at least ten members, half school staff (with classroom teachers in the majority) and half parents, community members, and, at secondary schools, students. The CDE's Schoolsite Council page is the clearest summary of all of this.

  6. This is the law, not just good practice. Under the Greene Act, Ed. Code § 35147(c)(1), any SSC meeting "shall be open to the public, and any member of the public shall be able to address the council or committee during the meeting on any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the council." Notice and an agenda must be posted at the school at least 72 hours in advance, so if you can't find your school's SSC schedule, ask the front office where it's posted.

  7. As of this writing in early September 2026. I'm a lead delegate, so this is a firsthand count rather than a published figure, and it will change as seats are filled. PSAC's full complement is 28 parent and nine student members across the seven electoral districts (OUSD District Committees).

  8. PSAC is OUSD's parent advisory committee under the Local Control Funding Formula, which every district must establish (Ed. Code § 52063). The superintendent is required to respond in writing to the committee's comments on the LCAP (Ed. Code § 52062(a)(2)). In OUSD's own words, PSAC members "advise the School Board, the Superintendent, and other district leaders on the actions and investments that should be included in our Local Control and Accountability Plan and budget," and the committee's recommendations go to the board each May and June (OUSD LCAP page).

  9. The board adopted the 2026-27 budget on June 24, 2026 with roughly $30 million in reductions still to be identified and approved this fall (The Oaklandside, June 25, 2026). District staff have said that target stays in place despite the roughly $20 million in additional state revenue booked in August (The Oaklandside, August 13, 2026). The line items are in the June 24 Financial Stabilization Plan presentation, which I walked through in A New Year at OUSD.

Get Updates

Your info is safe with us.